BIG Books – High concept?

Literary agent Kristin Nelson has sparked a debate among writers this week over her blog lament on the desire of publishers for ‘big’ books. With the economy still on an uphill climb, it’s understandable publishers are being more cautious, but what does that mean for us as writers? What is a ‘big’ book? Is this the same thing as high concept? I like definitions, but it’s hard to find ones that agree on these terms. As far as I can tell, ‘high concept’ started in the film industry to mean a concept that was easily understood and could be sold to a wide audience. Think ‘Jaws’: man-eating shark terrorizing town. ‘Titanic’: doomed love on a ship the audience already knew was going to sink.

These were both big movies, and both of those concepts are easily understood, but it is not so easy to predict which ones have wide appeal. Titanic yes, but Jaws? It did tap into some fundamental human fears of nature outside of human control . Maybe that’s why Jurassic Park succeeded. Dinosaurs are scary to begin with, but man-eating dinosaurs are really scary.

High concept can also mean high stakes. All those movies dealt with life or death, and not just to one or two characters. To bring it into the realm of literature, look at Harry Potter. I don’t know if that would have originally been pitched as high concept, but in essence it was. The stakes are not only for Harry’s life, but also for the future of the wizarding world.

So what do you think? How would you define a ‘big’ book? Is it the same as high concept?

This entry was posted in writing and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to BIG Books – High concept?

  1. bigwords88 says:

    In this instance I guess (and it is a wild guess) that the ‘big’ books are the ones which hit a wide demographic and bring in the bucks. Think of the analogy to ‘big’ films, and the box office takings are the defining factor in the continued success of a director. Same thing.

    If you look back at a lot of very successful writers’ careers you’ll find that there are plenty of people who didn’t hit their stride until their second or third book, so it’s a short term thinking. Ugh… It’s a long way from ‘good’ to ‘big’ books, and even though the two aren’t mutually exclusive, it’s the kind of financially-oriented way things are going.

    I would rather have a good book than a big book, but that is just my opinion.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s